Event exhibitor briefingExhibitor · Booth 203

TrioMRR at 2026 ASCP Annual Meeting & Exhibition

Browser-based medication regimen review software for recommendations, outcome follow-up, and facility-facing reports.

Organization background

What TrioMRR does

TrioMRR's public site describes monthly, admission, and interim review contexts, structured recommendations, outcome follow-up, and several facility-facing report formats. It also describes shared browser access and one centralized database for consultant-pharmacist teams.

The public evidence is much narrower on outside data connections. TrioMRR advertises conversion from RxPertise, but the pages reviewed do not identify a live dispensing, EHR, eMAR, HIE, or laboratory interface. A booth demonstration should therefore separate the one-time migration path from each ongoing data handoff a practice needs.

Connected MRR workflow

The company describes review context, recommendations, routing, outcomes, and reports as one connected process.

Several report views

Public material lists executive, resident-level, outcome, psychotropic, and recommendation-data outputs with reusable report profiles.

Shared browser access

The vendor says authorized users work in a centralized browser-based database without local software installation.

Why it matters to consultant pharmacists

The product maps directly to recurring consultant-pharmacist work. The useful booth test is a complete resident journey that exposes source-data preparation, recommendation follow-up, report release, correction history, and export—not a tour of isolated screens.

Our read

Why they may be attending

The ASCP floor plan establishes that TrioMRR has booth 203; it does not establish what the company will present or how the product performs. Our read is that the specialist audience makes a complete review-to-report demonstration and a detailed migration conversation more useful than a general cloud-software pitch.

  • Demonstrate the product's review, recommendation, follow-up, and reporting workflow to consultant pharmacists.
  • Discuss how an independent or growing practice would move from its current files or RxPertise data.
  • Hear where recurring facility data, coverage, report release, and follow-up create avoidable manual work.

Make the booth visit count

Questions worth taking with you

Can you run one resident from incoming data through review, recommendation, response, and a released report?

A continuous demonstration exposes manual handoffs that separate feature screens can conceal.

Which data movement is a one-time RxPertise conversion, and which source systems connect after go-live?

Migration evidence should not be mistaken for an ongoing dispensing, EHR, eMAR, HIE, or laboratory interface.

How are released reports corrected, retained, and tied to the recommendation and outcome history?

A reusable report profile is different from a defensible record of what the facility received.

What resident, review, recommendation, report, and audit data can a practice export during and after the contract?

A complete continuity plan needs structured records as well as printable reports.

Current official signal

Latest from TrioMRR

Official article · published June 24, 2026 · checked August 5, 2026

MRR review software: more computers, more problems

A company-authored article argues that distributed installations and separate databases complicate MRR work, then presents centralized software as the alternative.

Read the official update