Menu
technology

HTI-1 changed certified health IT. It did not make every pharmacy connection plug-and-play.

ONC's rule advances certification, USCDI, information sharing, and algorithm transparency. Consultant-pharmacy buyers still need to verify the named systems, data, direction, and implementation scope behind an integration claim.

By Editorial desk6 minute read

Team reviewing a healthcare data-flow diagram
A national interoperability standard does not replace an account-specific data-flow test.

What HTI-1 does

ONC says HTI-1 updates certification criteria, algorithm transparency, information-sharing provisions, and interoperability standards. USCDI version 3 becomes the certification-program baseline as of January 1, 2026.

Those developments can improve the environment for exchange, but they do not prove that a consultant-pharmacy application is certified, connected to a facility's system, or entitled to every desired data element.

Translate standards language into a data-flow question

Name the source and destination systems, versions, data classes and fields, direction, trigger, cadence, identity matching, error path, and source of truth. Ask which component is certified and under which criterion when certification is invoked.

Also ask who contracts, configures, tests, monitors, and pays for the connection. Technical possibility and an implemented supported interface are different buying facts.

Demonstrate the exception path

Use a realistic resident transfer or order change and include a duplicate, missing identifier, or delayed message. Inspect what users see and who is alerted.

Record the result as demonstrated, scoped work, unavailable, or still to confirm. Avoid turning a standards acronym into an integration score by itself.